Use case · Extracts & fractions

NMR dereplication

Use Spectra to test whether an extract or mixture component is already known before committing columns and instrument time to isolation.

Starting point
Concentrated fraction or extract with a recurring spin system
Typical input
1H at minimum; 13C when concentrated; solvent (e.g. DMSO-d6, CD3OD); optional fraction context
Spectra output
Ranked known library members, close analogues, and unexplained residual peaks
Chemist's call
Stop isolation on known compounds or prioritize novel residuals
NMR dereplication analytical schematic
WORKFLOW SCHEMATIC — Separate known library scaffolds from genuinely new analogues before committing columns and instrument time.
Inspecting the peak-picked 1H spectrum and signal table before unlocking formula-guided dereplication.
IN SPECTRA — Inspecting the peak-picked 1H spectrum and signal table before unlocking formula-guided dereplication.

Who this job is for and why it stalls

Natural-product and mixture chemists frequently encounter a clean spin system in a fraction and need to answer one question before scaling up chromatography: is this molecule already known?

Dereplication is a library problem with chemical nuance attached. Exact-match spectral searches break down when the solvent shifts slightly, when a minor component overlaps, or when 13C is partially incomplete. When a library search returns an inconclusive partial match, teams often isolate the compound anyway — spending days of preparative LC and magnet time on known flavonols, coumarins, sugars, or fatty-acid derivatives.

How the Spectra workflow runs

  1. Submit fraction NMR — Upload 1H and, whenever concentration permits, 13C data along with solvent and any molecular formula or mass context from LC-MS.
  2. Retrieve knowns and scaffold neighbours — Spectra searches across known structures and ranks candidates that fit the observed chemical shifts rather than relying on rigid peak-for-peak identity.
  3. Separate exact fits from scaffold analogues — Inspect the 13C RMSD and per-shift residuals. A low residual across the carbon skeleton points to a known compound you can set aside; a localized shift deviation flags a substitution difference worth isolating.
  4. Account for matrix leftovers — Review the unexplained signals list to distinguish co-eluting minor components from a genuinely different core structure.

What to look for in the review

  • Low 13C residual across all diagnostic positions: strong evidence that the fraction’s main component is a known library member. Verify against an in-house standard and save the isolation column.
  • High match on the core scaffold but a 3–6 ppm residual at one or two carbons: classic signature of a positional isomer, methylation pattern difference, or modified side chain. Keep in the isolation queue.

Related: natural-products research workflow, natural products and ingredient labs, sample analysis.

Scope & limitations

Where this workflow stops

A new analogue of a common scaffold can resemble the parent compound until 13C or 2D data are available. Dereplication is a triage filter, not a certificate of novelty or identity.

Chemist sign-off

Recommended validation

Overlay with an authentic standard or reference spectrum when available. When no standard exists, advance only the fractions whose 13C residuals remain unexplained by known library members.